Student: Critical Thinking and Sensory Data

Assignment 1 arresting PerceptionsCan you really trust your senses and the reading of centripetal data to give you an consummate view of the world? Describe and argue the truth and the weaknesses of the human senses as they concern to thinking in general and to your decl are thinking in particular.Write a two to cardinal (23) page (approximately 500750 word) motif that addresses the happening 1. result at to the lowest degree threesome (3) reasons for accept in the the true or in verity of receptive in changeion. 2. Identify and mark at least(prenominal)(prenominal) three (3) factors add to the true statement or inaccuracy of afferent data. 3. plow the roles of nature and upbringing with regard to the translation and evaluation of sensory data. 4. role at least two (2) quality resources in this fitting. Your textbook whitethorn count as 1 (1) source. At least one and only(a) (1) of your sources must be obtained from the collection of databases come-a t-able from the Learning Resources Center Web page. The format of the paper is to be as follows1. Typed, double-spaced, time New Roman instance (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides, APA format. 2. In addition to the two (2) pages assigned, a call page with the title of the assignment, your name, the instructors name, the pedigree title, and the ascertain is to be included, as well as a Reference Page. Sources documented development APA style for in-text citations and listed on the References Page utilise APA style format. Assignment 1 sensory Perceptions Due Week 2 and outlay 100 pointsCan you really trust your senses and the recital of sensory data to give you an completed view of the world? Describe and talk of the accuracy and the weaknesses of the human senses as they link up to thinking in general and to your deliver thinking in particular. Write a 2-3 page paper in which you1. put up at least three (3) reasons for accept in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sen sory information. 2. Identify and see at least three (3) factors bring to the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory data. 3. Discuss the roles of nature and nurture with regard to the interpretation and evaluation of sensory data. 2010 straggler University, All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in wholly or in part, without the expressed scripted permission of Strayer University. PHI 210 Student variate 1134 1071 04-11-11 Page 6 of 314. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Your textbook may count as one (1) source. At least one (1) of your sources must be obtained from the collection of databases amicable from the Learning Resources Center Web page.Your assignment must Be typed, double spaced, exploitation Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides citations and references must follow APA or school-speci fic format. Check with your professor for both additional instructions. Include a process page containing the title of the assignment, the students name, the professors name, the course title, and the date. The speak page and the reference page are not included in the require assignment page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are gird skills for overcoming barriers which limit objective and productive deprecative thinking. Create written work utilizing the concepts of over critical thinking. Demonstrate adherence to academic fair play policy and APA Style guidelines for academic citations. Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.Write intelligibly and concisely about issues in critical thinking using proper makeup mechanics.Grading for this assignment will be found on answer quality, logic/ makeup of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the next rubric. Points 100 Assignment 1 arresting PerceptionsCriteria Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A1. Provide at least three (3) reasons for accept in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. metric weight unit 30%Did not study or incompletely provided at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. Insufficiently provided at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. partly provided at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. satisfactorily provided at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. Thoroughly provided at least three (3) reasons for believing in the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory information. 2. Identify and describe at least three (3) factors change to the accuracy or inaccuracy of sensory data. Weight 30%Did not submit or incompletely determine and draw at least three (3) factors contributing to the accuracy or Insufficiently identified and described at least three (3) factors contributing to the accuracy or Partially identified and described at least three (3) factors contributing to the accuracy or Satisfactorily identified and described at least three (3) factors contributing to the accuracy or Thoroughly identified and described at least three (3) factors contributing to the accuracy or 3.